Occurrence of Pedestrian Accident

A Short Study For The Occurrence of Pedestrian Accident in California

A Short Study For The Occurrence of Pedestrian Accident in California


The occurrence of the accident concerning pedestrians typically originates from driver inattentiveness and negligence. In several conditions, when a person is in a crosswalk while crossing the road, drivers, especially those drivers who are turning right, do not see the movements to their left or go straight forward before turning the right. These drivers are prompting some severe injuries to pedestrians who are in the middle of crossing a road.


There is a variety of potential reasons when a driver’s behavior of driving becomes inattentive or careless despite being super careful while taking a right turn. The driver must be busy writing the text message or what’s app message or might be busy shooting an email to someone.

During the operation of his vehicle, he tries to eat something that results in some sense of laxity on his part.  Besides these, he might be occupied in looking at a different direction instead of paying the required level of heed to the direction.  Or, he might be drunk or might be driving under some other such influences.


All the above-mentioned reasons can result in pedestrian accidents and prompt pedestrians to sustain severe injuries such as fractured bones, fractured legs, shocking brain injury, spinal-related injury, and quadriplegic or sustaining enduring paraplegic injuries. The lawyers from power should be essential to hire as your allies to take care of and present your cases in front of the honorable court.


The Occurrence of Pedestrian Accidents Based in Loss Angeles 


As per the Los Angeles Times,  the occurrence of pedestrian-related accidents have a significant influence on Los Angeles. After carefully checking into more than 665,000 traffic-related accidents between 2002 and 2013, around 579 intersections in Los Angeles had been identified; those were more prone than the normal rate of pedestrians hit by cars.

The most numbers of “highly problematic” intersections for the use of the walking people were there in the Downtown area of Los Angeles. Among them, around 48 were considered perilous crossings.


In the pocket of Koreatown at a juncture, where two Metro rail lines have the meeting point,  there were more than 400 pedestrians who had sustained injuries because of the negligence driving of cars, apart from eleven dangerous fatalities.


A couple of Hollywood’s more iconic boulevards—Santa Monica, Sunset, and Hollywood are also super prone areas for crossings; it might on account of an enormous volume in tourist foot traffic.

While the city has tried to alleviate the injuries to these pedestrians and lessen the number of deaths through high visibility intersections and broader curbs, in the end, drivers must be conscious of pedestrians, especially going through the congested areas.


Varieties of Compensation In Pedestrian Accidents

If a person who sustains injuries because of the negligent driving has a right to claim monetary or non-monetary compensation depending upon the gravity and nature of the damages.


Fiscal Related Damages


Monetary compensation can pay past, and future-related medical bills,  and past, present, as well as future lost wages and the quantum of lost earning capacity. If a person, while crossing the road, sustains permanently injured in a severe accident. He can’t work anymore or can’t do the same job. That injured person has the right to be awarded monetary compensation for the loss of his/her capacity to earn his bread.


Non-Monetary Loss


An injured pedestrian may have the right to recover against damages from a variety of conditions.

These conditions are against the pain and hardships, emotional anxiety, any physical impairment, the problems because of the occurrence of accident, disfigurement, besides other non-monetary loss.


It may be challenging to replace a figure on these sorts of damages; however, the law firm has been attained the success in compromising cases and making judges convinced so that the offender can be awarded the maximum amount of pain and suffering.

These punishments should be in proportion to the non-fiscal loss that the plaintiff deserves.



%d bloggers like this: